Why I Returned My Roomba – How-to-Geek

Robot vacuums sound great.

They do the vacuuming for you, saving time and hassle. And they’ve come down in price, too–you can get a decent Roomba for a little over $300.

But while plenty of people seem happy with their Roombas, but I decided to return mine.

Vacuuming still isn’t fun, but a solid cordless vacuum is more useful to me than a gimmicky robot.

The Roomba is far from “set and forget”–in fact, it still requires a fair amount of manual work on your part, and you’ll still have to pull our the traditional vacuum for some spots.

To me, this kind of defeats the purpose of a robot vacuum in the first place. Let me explain.

Read more: Robot Vacuums Aren’t as Convenient as They Seem (or Why I Returned My Roomba)

Don’t forget to share this via , , Google+, Pinterest, LinkedIn, Buffer, , Tumblr, Reddit, StumbleUpon and Delicious.

Mike Rawson

Mike Rawson has recently re-awoken a long-standing interest in robots and our automated future.

He lives in London with a single android – a temperamental vacuum cleaner – but is looking forward to getting more cyborgs soon.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Why I Returned My Roomba – How-to-Geek

by Mike Rawson time to read: 1 min
Hi there - can I help you with anything?
[Subscribe here]
 
More in News, The Home
Robots in hotels
Robots in hotels – JLL

From hotel lobbies to restaurant floors, robots have started servicing customers’ basic requests. According to the European Commission, the market...

Close