Free exchange: Why taxing robots is not a good idea | The Economist

BILL GATES is an unlikely Luddite, however much Microsoft may have provoked people to take a hammer to their computers. Yet in a recent interview with Quartz, an online publication, he expressed scepticism about society’s ability to manage rapid automation. To forestall a social crisis, he mused, governments should consider a tax on robots; if automation slows as a result, so much the better.

It is an intriguing if impracticable idea, which reveals a lot about the challenge of automation.In some distant future robots with their own consciousnesses, nest-eggs and accountants might pay income taxes like the rest of us (presumably with as much enthusiasm). That is not what Mr Gates has in mind. He argues that today’s robots should be taxed—either their installation, or the profits firms enjoy.

Read more: Free exchange: Why taxing robots is not a good idea | The Economist

Don’t forget to share this via , , Google+, Pinterest, LinkedIn, Buffer, , Tumblr, Reddit, StumbleUpon and Delicious.

Mike Rawson

Mike Rawson has recently re-awoken a long-standing interest in robots and our automated future. He lives in London with a single android - a temperamental vacuum cleaner - but is looking forward to getting more cyborgs soon.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free exchange: Why taxing robots is not a good idea | The Economist

by Mike Rawson time to read: 1 min
Hi there - can I help you with anything?
[Subscribe here]
 
More in Economics, News
Bill Gates says tax robots
Bill Gates: the robot that takes your job should pay taxes — Quartz

Robots are taking human jobs. But Bill Gates believes that governments should tax companies’ use of them, as a way...

Close