Why go to Mars when you can telecommute there instead?

Every few weeks, a telepresence robot rolls by my desk. It’s usually a co-worker in a distant office on her way to a meeting, or checking in on the progress of physical things in the office from the comfort of her home.

At first, it was surprising to hear the whir of a robot and see a smiling face roll by. But now, it’s normal. Over the past 40 years, telepresence technologies have gone from being complicated, huge, or non-existent to being so ubiquitous and powerful that they’re used everywhere from operating rooms to your phone.

So, why not send them to space?

That’s the argument put forward in an article in Science Robotics. As people discuss the best ways to explore other planets, some wonder if it’s even necessary to send people to the ground.

Read more: Why go to Mars when you can telecommute there instead? | Popular Science

Don’t forget to share this via , , Google+, Pinterest, LinkedIn, Buffer, , Tumblr, Reddit, StumbleUpon and Delicious.

Mike Rawson

Mike Rawson has recently re-awoken a long-standing interest in robots and our automated future.

He lives in London with a single android – a temperamental vacuum cleaner – but is looking forward to getting more cyborgs soon.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Why go to Mars when you can telecommute there instead?

by Mike Rawson time to read: 1 min
Hi there - can I help you with anything?
[Subscribe here]
 
More in Drones, News
Defibrillator drones
Defibrillator-carrying drones could save lives, research suggests

Drones are already employed for anything from military to recreational use, from oil exploration to filmmaking, but they could also...

Close